home

Archive for the 'Uncategorized' Category

Parents with disabilities rights

Wednesday, January 6th, 2021

published in the Republican January 2021

Five years ago, the Department of Justice and Health and Human Services, in response to a complaint filed by a disabled mother, determined that the Massachusetts Department of Children and Families discriminated against a mother who has intellectual disabilities.  The department felt that due to her disability, her newborn should be removed and her parental rights be terminated.

Over time, complaints have been received from parents with other disabilities.  For example, the state denied reasonable modifications and failed to provide equal access to its services.  Under an agreementthat was reached in November, the Department of Children and Families “will not base decisions about removal of a child on stereotypes or generalizations about persons with disabilities, or on a parent’s disability, diagnosis or intelligence measures (e.g., IQ scores) alone.”  Furthermore, disabled parents must be permitted to receive the department’s services “unless the parent poses a direct threat to the health or safety of others.”

Even though the Department of Children and Families is committed to the settlement, it denies all allegations of discrimination.  This is considered a landmark decision protecting the rights of parents with disabilities.

Disability Policy

Thursday, December 31st, 2020

published in the Republican January 2021

This month, a new President takes control of our government.  In his disability plan, Joe Biden vowed to appoint a director of disability policy.  The person appointed should be aware of disability issues that are important to people with disabilities, from health care to Social Security and special education.

Another important issue is to deal with COVID-19, especially in group home and nursing home settings where the infection flares up and grows.  We also need to ensure that proper equipment is provided for home and community based services.

In the past there have been orders made to disability policy that have harmed people with disabilities and their rights that need to be reversed. One example is undoing payroll tax deferrals that affect SSDI and SSI payments.  Another example is work requirements for people on Medicaid that put them at risk of losing coverage.

There are several other issues that need to be considered, starting with affordable health insurance.  SSI and SSDI need to be updated to allow people with disabilities to earn and save money without losing their benefits.

More importantly, advocates need to ensure that people with disabilities are guaranteed the right to live and blossom in their own communities.


Reflections

Wednesday, December 23rd, 2020

published in the Republican December 2020

The year 2020 will go down as a historic year that people will be talking about for years to come.  Through the year, the nation, along with the rest of the world, has been dealing with a health crisis called COVID-19.

Starting in March, states everywhere were going into lockdowns and quarantines, from schools closing to businesses shutting down.  We saw a flurry of activity resulting from stores being sold out of many household items.  We were ordered to wear facemasks and practice social distancing.  The end result was severe financial difficulties for people out of work.  Schools were forced into conducting online classes.  On the other side of the coin, many medical professionals were overworked caring for virus victims.

Due to scientists developing a vaccine at record speed, we are hopeful that the vaccines will help solve the health crisis.  This experience has taught us to put our health and safety first while becoming more adaptive.  More importantly, we should be more positive and grateful for what we have.

Making history

Wednesday, December 16th, 2020

published in the Republican December 2020

In Florida, Chris Nikic, a 27 year old young man with Down Syndrome, set a new world record when he became the first athlete with Down Syndrome to win the Ironman Triathlon.

He finished a 2.4-mile swim, a 112-mile bike ride and a 26.2-mile run in 16 hours and 46 minutes.  In order to gain the title of Ironman, he needed to complete the race in seventeen hours.

Over his life he has faced many different obstacles.  But he did not let them stop him from achieving in his life.  His father’s goal for his son was to improve by one percent every day.  A strong performance in the Special Olympics gave him his first taste of competition.  His next goal is to compete in the Ironman World Championship.

This is a perfect example of someone making their dream a reality with hard work and determination.  With the right mindset, anything is possible.

Supported decision making

Tuesday, December 8th, 2020

published in the Republican December 2020

A man with autism had his rights stripped due to guardianship.  In November, a judge terminated guardianship in favor of using a less restrictive method called supported decision making.

Supported decision making allows people with disabilities to make choices about their own life with support from people they choose, such as family, friends or professionals whom they trust.  It is considered an alternative to guardianship.  The point is to allow the person with disabilities to have a say in their own life instead of having no say. 

Just because someone has a disability doesn’t mean they don’t have their own preferences and desires.  They have a right to be involved in deciding where they want to work and live.  The support system can help them educate, research and make reasonable decisions.  The goal is to make the individual feel valued and part of their own life.  Being independent means having control of one’s life.

This process can increase pride and self-confidence while increasing their own happiness.  This is also a way to gain new experiences while expanding their knowledge.  It can also teach an individual how to work with others while gaining communication skills.  More importantly, they can become their own advocates.

Cerebral palsy

Tuesday, December 1st, 2020

published in the Republican December 2020

Cerebral palsy is a group of disorders that affect movement and muscle tone.  It is usually caused by damage to the brain during or before birth.  Cerebral palsy can range from mild to severe disability.

For example, it can cause impaired movement, loss of control over limbs, rigid muscles, abnormal posture, involuntary movement, unsteady walking andbalance issues.

The National Institutes of Health conducted a study that was published in the journal Nature Genetics.  The study found that fourteen percent of cerebral palsy cases might be linked to genetics.  Michael Kruer, a neurogeneticist at the PhoenixChildren’s Hospital and the University of Arizona College of Medicine, said, “Our results provide the strongest evidence to date that a significant portion of cerebral palsy cases can be linked to rare genetic mutations, and in doing so identified several key genetic pathways involved.”

As the study goes on, it has been determined that many of the genes are important to the brain wiring.  These genes are involved in the early stages of development and may be linked to intellectual disabilities, autism or epilepsy.  Kruer also stated, “We hope this study can give peace of mind to parents who may have been told over the years that there must have been some kind of problem during the pregnancy or delivery to cause their child to have cerebral palsy.  Our study has implications for genetic counseling for parents who have a child with cerebral palsy, in helping determine the chances of a second child being similarly affected.”

Wages

Tuesday, December 1st, 2020

published in the Republican December 2020

A policy that allows people with developmental disabilities to be paid less than minimum wage in sheltered workshops has been under attack by advocates for being discriminatory.  The US Commission on Civil Rights wrote a report saying that the policy should be ended.

Some families say that sheltered workshops enable the disabled individual to gain a sense of self worth.  Advocates of abolishing subminimum wage say that it holds people with developmental disabilities back from achieving financial independence and advancing to traditional employment in the overall workforce.

The report found that “failures in regulation and oversight…have allowed and continue to allow the program to operate without satisfying its legislative goal to meet the needs of people with disabilities to receive supports necessary to become ready for employment in the competitive economy.”  Rie Kennedy-Lizotte, the director of employment policy for the National Association of State Directors of Developmental Disability Services, said, “I have seen the issue raised more than once to eliminate subminimum wage, but it’s never gotten to this level of action.”

Several states have outlawed subminimum wage.  Some of the states are New Hampshire, Alaska and Maryland.  The cities of Seattle and Reno have also terminated subminimum wage.

In 2019, a bill labeled the Raise the Wage Act passed the House of Representatives but has not been deliberated on in the Senate.  Senator Patty Murray of Washington said, “For too long, some workers with disabilities have been relegated to subminimum wage jobs where they are segregatedfrom their peers and paid far too little.  As this report shows, this is a violation of their civil rights – and we need to act now to end it.”

Affordable care act

Monday, November 23rd, 2020

published in the Republican November 2020

This month, the U.S. Supreme Court held oral argument in a case challenging the Affordable Care Act. The case, California v. Texas, claims that the law’s individual mandate requiring people to buy health insurance is unconstitutional. There are nineteen different disability advocacy groups that filed a brief in the Supreme Court arguing that striking down the law would endanger the health of disabled individuals. Some organizations that joined the brief are the Association of University Centers on Disabilities, the Arc, the National Disability Rights Network and the Judge David L. Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law. The Act has greatly increased opportunities for people to gain health insurance. It also protects people from being denied coverage because of preexisting conditions. In addition, it guarantees services for mental illness, home health care and bans discrimination. The brief stated, “By including these provisions, Congress intentionally sought to benefit people with disabilities. It would not have wanted to sacrifice all of these protections merely because the minimum-coverage provision were declared invalid.” Even though a decision in the case is not expected until next year, several of the Supreme Court Justices are showing signs of supporting the Affordable Care Act. At the hearing, Justice Kavanaugh said, “I tend to agree with you that it’s a very straightforward case for severability under our precedents, meaning that we would excise the mandate and leave the rest of the act in place.”

Hopeful future

Tuesday, November 10th, 2020

Published in the Republican November 2020

At the beginning of the month, the whole nation waited with bated breath to see who won the presidential election.  Votes trickled in slowly over days until CNN and the Associated Press projected Joe Biden as the winner.  We also saw history in the making by the election of the first black and Asian woman as the Vice President in Kamala Harris.

Following the announcement, the President-elect spoke to the nation, saying, “We must make the promise of the country real for everybody – no matter their race, their ethnicity, their faith, their identity or their disability.”  In previous speeches, Joe Biden has said he is committed to increasing Social SecuritySupplemental Income benefits, full funding for the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, providing support for direct care workers and family caregivers.

Julia Bascom, the executive director of the Autistic Self Advocacy Network, said, “President-elect Biden has made many concrete commitments to the disability community, including strengthening and expanding home- and community-based services, ending subminimum wage and promoting supported decision-making.”

Over the next couple of years, I will choose to pray with love and hope that we can come together to bring about positive change in peace, love and happiness.

Social work

Thursday, October 29th, 2020

published in the Republican November 2020

A social worker’s purpose is to help individuals live their best life in their communities while overcoming daily challenges.  They foster self-determination and social responsibility.  The social workers work with a variety of different groups of people across the country. 

Several weeks ago, Texas Governor Greg Abbott recommended a change to the code of conduct for social workers.  His recommendation was to delete language that bars social workers from rejectingclients on the basis of disability, sexual orientation orgender identity.  Abbott stated that “the code’s nondiscrimination protections went beyond protections laid out in the state law that governs how and when the state may discipline social workers.”

After the change in the rule, there was a firestorm of criticism from social workers and advocates.  The National Association of Social Workers called the change unnecessary and also criticized the decision, saying that it was made solely on the governor’s recommendation without considering public opinionas required.  Texas State Representative Sarah Davis said “Removing these protections from the code of conduct will increase stigma for vulnerable groups, which will only serve to discourage them from seeking care.”

After the backlash the Texas Behavioral Health Executive Council voted to reinstate the language that was removed.  The executive director of the Texas chapter of the National Association of Social Workers, Will Francis, said, “We are so grateful for the vote to keep the anti-discrimination protections in place.  This is a recognition of the key principle that a social worker’s beliefs must never impede a person’s right to self-determination or access to services.”